On Feb 28th, 2015, Lord John Browne (former CEO of Rockefeller owned BP) announced he was joining forces with Council on Foreign Relations member, Mikhail Fridman. Together, they plan on circumventing the so called “sanctions” against Russia, and will utilize secret agreements with the British government which will allow LetterOne energy (Russian) to operate within the UK and at various locations throughout the west. Look out Lord Mandelson, you aren’t the only British royal with a foothold on Russian soil.
In recent news, the world’s largest oilfield services company, Schlumberger Limited agreed to purchase a 45.6 percent stake in Eurasia Drilling Co. Ltd. Eurasia Drilling is a Russian oil company based on the mainland. Why would American based Schlumberger risk a 1.7 billion purchase in a country that America is supposedly in a new cold war with? Maybe because the entire new “cold war” is fake. The New World Order conspiracy may be deeper and larger than anyone ever imagined. There is a 99.9% chance that the entire Ukraine situation was a joint operation between Russia and the West. Are we witnessing the old strategy of agitation? What will be the outcome? Rest assured, Putin will end up living in a New World Order funded mansion, just like his Luciferian friend Gorbachev.
After the Rockefellers split up Standard Oil in order to hide their oil monopoly, they retained majority ownership in all of the “new” companies. The Rockefellers own the controlling stake in companies such as Exxon, Marathon, Conoco Phillips, Chevron, and BP (Amoco). The Rockefellers constantly juggle oil assets between these family owned oil companies. They often use this scheme in order to hide bad publicity and circumvent regulation. Although BP is headquartered in London, it is a Rockefeller company.
As the Rockefellers and Putin work hand in hand to usher in their world dictatorship, a ruse was necessary in order to convince the world that Putin was at odds with the West. This simple trick placed alleged sanctions on Exxon. However, behind the scenes, David Rockefeller Jr. and Putin devised a secret plan to continue pumping oil in a joint operation. This plan involved replacing Exxon rigs with Rockefeller owned BP rigs and continuing to pump oil in a joint deal with Russian state owned Rosneft.
We tried to warn many freedom activists about Putin and his connections to the globalist banking mafia run by the Rothschild and Rockefeller families. We were ridiculed and laughed at for telling the truth. Now, Putin has come forward with his new solution for the world…a “New World Order.” In the end, this KGB “mad man” has been working with the banksters all along. Even Russian government run RT news is pumping Putin’s new call for a world dictatorship!
By AE_Forms@ae911truth.org (Tony Szamboti) The End of the Road for NIST
By Tony Szamboti
Editor’s Note: In recent years, various members of the AE911Truth team have been working on a white paper titled “Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports.” Last month they finally completed the document. Its 25 concise points offer the most convincing proof that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the September 11, 2001, destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings were unscientific and fraudulent. The authors of “The 25 Points” designed the document to provide material that would compel the convening of a grand jury. Whether or not a grand jury is ever impaneled in any jurisdiction, though, readers of this white paper have the duty and privilege of acting as a virtual grand jury in all jurisdictions. After weighing the evidence meticulously laid out in “The 25 Points,” readers can, by their resulting actions, help determine whether there will one day be a new, fully funded, truly independent, wholly transparent, and unimpeachably honest investigation of 9/11.
Areas of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports
Below is a series of twenty-five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself – including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross – should be investigated.
Table of Contents
WTC 7 – THE THIRD SKYSCRAPER
1. OMISSION OF GIRDER STIFFENERS SHOWN ON FRANKEL DRAWING #9114 2
2. OMISSION OF THREE LATERAL SUPPORT BEAMS ON THE 13TH FLOOR G3005 BEAM 2
3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED 3
4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST’S COMPUTER MODEL 3
5. CLAIMS OF INVESTIGATING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION WITHOUT TESTING FOR …read more
By hqanon Written by: NiRA
Million Mask March to remind the world that fairness, justice and freedom are more than just words.
So what is the largest collective real-world operation? Well if you think it is the Million Mask March then you are absolutely correct. In the previous year this event was able to get a huge success in causing the loosely knit network together for one whole day, it was because the event took place on a huge scale, it was practised in every city making Million Mask March a great accomplishment for Anonymous.
In the previous year, the homeless people from the city didn’t starve as Anonymous activists showed up well in advance of the 5th November and did a job that everyone of us should try to do at least once a week, they started feeding city’s homeless people. Marchers met each other on the morning of 5th November at Washington Memorial and then they soon made their way to march to Lafayette Park through the streets from the White House. All the efforts done by the Officers to hold the protesters were all worthless. A number of people were arrested in the event, whereas most of these arrests were just minor catch and release arrests, but some officers trumped several charges against an Anonymous activist that cuts a police line. But, as it is said that truth can’t be hidden for long, soon with the help of video evidence, the obvious lies by the officer were exposed and all the major charges on the Anonymous activist were discharged.
Due to the first arrest there was a tense atmosphere but soon the marchers got back in action and made their way to Pennsylvania Avenue where they continued their protest, which caused the closing down of country’s most famous street. On their …read more
By josep34 Originally published at The Litigation Daily by Michael D. Goldhabe on 10/15/14
The World Trade Center on Sept. 17, 2001.
An earlier version of this story stated that 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report are classified. In fact, the 28 pages were redacted from the report by the congressional joint inquiry into 9/11 intelligence. The story has been so revised.
“I loooove to pick on the Saudis,” the South Carolina trial lawyer Ronald Motley said in a 2004 New York Times magazine cover story, “A Nation Unto Himself.”
The U.S. executive and judiciary are less eager to tweak the House of Saud. But Motley’s trillion-dollar 2002 claim against the Kingdom, captioned In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, has experienced a slow-motion revival that culminated last month in the quiet filing of a devastating new complaint. The Sept. 15 amended complaint, filed by the late Motley’s more sober co-counsel at Cozen O’Connor, only seeks some $200 billion for Saudia Arabia’s alleged role in backing the 9/11 terrorists. The lively, 156-page narrative reads as a prequel to the 9/11 Commission Report, and as a much-needed corrective.
Exactly a week later, a jury in the world’s first terror funding trial found Jordan’s Arab Bank liable for funneling money from a Saudi state charity to Hamas during the Palestinian intifada. “The core issue in 9/11 and Arab Bank is the same,” says Motley Rice’s Jodi Flowers, who acts for the plaintiffs in both cases. “As one of the Arab Bank jurors put it: ‘The money and the financing is the oxygen for the terrorists.’”
But while the Arab Bank trial dealt with the flow of $100 million to one corner of world jihad, the 9/11 complaint assails the whole network of Saudi institutions that have spent billions to spread a radical form of Islam, and allegedly supported …read more
By josep34 Originally published at BORDC by Christina Murray on 10/17/14
“Some stories are just too true to tell.”
This quote from the trailer of “Kill the Messenger,” a film about the life of reporter Gary Webb, who wrote on the CIA’s role in drug trafficking in 1996, sums up exactly why reporters like Webb are important, and why understanding the role of powerhouses such as the CIA and other government organizations is crucial in how we see ourselves within our own country.
The movie is a close, dramatic retelling of the life of Gary Webb, who, when he broke the story of the Nicaraguan drug cartel that transported drugs to Los Angeles, received intense support and intense critique. Eventually San Jose Mercury, the newspaper that Webb wrote for, backed away from the story fearing severe backlash. This effectively ended Webb’s career. The most heartbreaking moment in Webb’s story is the story of his death, which the film does address. In 2004, Webb was found dead, he has apparently committed suicide.
The film’s main objective is to address the role of the CIA during the Reagan administration in supporting, or at least ignoring, the Nicaraguan cocaine trade.
Contra Commandos from FDN and ARDE Frente Sur, Nueva Guinea area in 1987
“The [New York] Times’ resistance to accepting the reality of this major national security scandal under President Ronald Reagan even predated its tag-team destruction of Webb in the mid-1990s, when he was alternately pummeled by the Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times.” This quote by Robert Parry, who also broke this same scandal in 1985 addresses the fear of realizing what the CIA is capable of. The CIA was, according to Webb, aware of the shipments of drugs that were coming into the U.S.
The post Killing the Messenger: CIA, Contras and …read more
By hqanon Written by: Alek Hidell
Every time I turn on the news, all I hear about is ISIS. I like to think I keep up with things and I’m still kind of bewildered by ISIS. So let me get this straight…Obama keeps with the deadline set by the Bush administration and withdraws troops from Iraq. The American people were sick of war and wanted out. Of course the opposition pitched their usual fit, but the deadline arrived and the troops came home. All of a sudden there is a new terrorist threat, ISIS, who goes around cutting people’s heads off and now 70% of the American public support going back to war. This seems a little too convenient to me. This reeks of the intelligence community’s touch. I find it amazing that people are so willing to jump back into military conflict after suffering war fatigue for the last decade. The war has achieved nothing tangible for the American people and has only thrown the country into further economic turmoil. Once upon a time war meant a booming economy. Not anymore. The military industrial complex grinds on at the expense of the soldiers who give their lives for an ideal which doesn’t appear to be shared by their superiors.
ISIS has been around for a while, but over the years has changed it’s name several times. It has been known as the JTJ, the AQI, The Islamic State Iraq, Al-Qaeda in Iraq and ultimately the Islamic State which we in America like to call ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria). So what exactly is ISIS? ISIS is the next wave of boogie men that we as American’s are told we must degrade and destroy, or whatever Obama said about them, because if …read more
By josep34 Originally posted at The NY Post by Paul Sperry on 10/5/14
Mohamed Atta, right, and Abdulaziz Alomari, center, pass through airport security at the Portland jetport to catch a commuter flight to Boston on the day of the Sept. 11 attacks.Portland Police photo/AP
At least three eyewitnesses spotted al Qaeda hijackers casing the security checkpoints at Boston’s Logan Airport months before the 9/11 attacks. They saw something and said something — but were ignored, newly unveiled court papers reveal.
One of the witnesses, an American Airlines official, actually confronted hijacking ringleader Mohamed Atta after watching him videotape and test a security checkpoint in May 2001 — four months before he boarded the American Airlines flight that crashed into the World Trade Center.
The witness alerted security, but authorities never questioned the belligerent Egyptian national or flagged him as a threat.
“I’m convinced that had action been taken after the sighting of Atta, the 9/11 attacks, at least at Logan, could have been deterred,” said Brian Sullivan, a former FAA special agent who at the time warned of holes in security at the airport.
The three Boston witnesses were never publicly revealed, even though they were interviewed by the FBI and found to be credible. Their names didn’t even appear as footnotes in the 9/11 commission report.
But what they testified to seeing — only revealed now as part of the discovery in a settled 9/11 wrongful-death suit against the airlines and the government — can only be described as chilling.…
The post Airport Security Ignored pre-911 Warnings on Hijackers appeared first on 911Truth.org. …read more